Construction Loan Draws

Project

Draw Manager Budget Items

Year

2026

At The Mortgage Office, I worked on improving the Budget Items experience within Draw Manager, a tool used by private lenders to manage construction loan disbursements. Construction lenders use this feature to review project budgets, approve draw requests, and track how loan funds are distributed throughout a project's lifecycle.

Although several enterprise customers had purchased this feature, adoption remained low, with many relying on external platforms and manual processes instead. The goal is to increase adoption by simplifying workflows and reducing friction throughout the draw request experience.

Scope of Work

Fintech
Adoption
Visibilty
Priviate Lending

Problem

Despite purchasing the feature, enterprise customers were not actively using it.

Research uncovered several pain points:

  • Multi-step workflows required excessive clicking

  • Users could not edit budget items after creation

  • Important information was difficult to locate

  • No ability to leave notes or collaborate

  • Limited visibility into draw request status

  • Inability to split payments between multiple payees

  • Difficulties adding new vendors

  • UI inconsistencies and bugs created friction

Solution

We focused on high-impact improvements that could be implemented quickly while minimizing disruption to existing systems.

Key improvements included:

  • Introducing a notes experience for collaboration

  • Adding loan status and disbursement progress tracking

  • Surfacing key dates, including requested and estimated pay dates

  • Enabling multiple payees and payment splitting

  • Improving information hierarchy and reducing the need to leave modals

  • Fixing UI inconsistencies and visual bugs

Constraints & Challenges

Working Within Existing Systems

Engineering bandwidth was limited, so we needed to identify improvements that delivered immediate value without disrupting legacy CSS or requiring significant development effort.

This required balancing:

  • Customer impact

  • Engineering feasibility

  • Technical constraints

  • Long-term scalability

The guiding question became:

Which improvements would meaningfully increase adoption while remaining lightweight enough to implement?